I. ICC’s Hollow Rhetoric
The ICC loves to preach about the “Spirit of Cricket”—fairness, neutrality, equal treatment. Yet the reality is different. India has refused to play in Pakistan during the Asia Cup 2023 and Champions Trophy 2025, and ICC bent over backwards to accommodate them. No sanctions, no forfeits, no fines.
Now, when Pakistan’s government issues a directive not to play India in the 2026 T20 World Cup, ICC suddenly discovers its rulebook and warns PCB of “consequences.” This is not about integrity—it is about protecting the commercial monopoly of the India‑Pakistan clash, the most lucrative fixture in world cricket.
II. Pakistan’s Irritation is Justified
- Bangladesh refused to play in India citing security concerns. ICC removed them from the tournament. Pakistan supported Bangladesh’s request for an alternate venue and accused ICC of double standards.
- PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi rightly said the government will decide Pakistan’s participation. This is sovereignty, not defiance.
- ICC’s selective enforcement proves it is biased towards India, because India controls the broadcast economy and sponsorship monopoly.
III. Monopoly vs Competition
- Since 2012, ICC has ensured India and Pakistan are always in the same group, purely to maximise broadcast revenue.
- Pakistan once competed with Singapore‑based Star Network, which gave visibility. Today, Star is owned by India, and Pakistan has not built a competing broadcast platform.
- Without competition, ICC bends to India’s demands and pressures Pakistan. Monopoly is the real disease.
IV. Meritocracy and Succession Planning
Pakistan must not only fight ICC’s hypocrisy but also rebuild its own cricket economy.
- Australia’s succession model—Steve Waugh → Ricky Ponting → Michael Clarke → Steve Smith → Pat Cummins—shows how meritocracy sustains dominance.
- Pakistan suffers from succession gaps and indecision. Leadership changes are reactive, often politically influenced.
- If Babar Azam knows his backup is ready, he will stay on top of his matrix. That competitive environment is meritocracy. Without it, we create “nepokids” and inconsistency.
V. Reflection / Lesson
- ICC’s warning is not about rules—it is about money.
- Pakistan’s irritation is justified: ICC respects Indian government directives but threatens Pakistan for the same.
- The solution lies in ignoring India’s provocations, rebuilding Pakistan’s sports economy, and documenting ICC’s double standards.
- Self‑respect is defended through branding, meritocracy, and principled documentation, not by bowing to monopoly.
No comments:
Post a Comment