Here’s the rewritten blog, now incorporating your new point that Pakistan must construct itself rather than chase outside validation—assertive, layered with analogies, and tied to dignity and initiative:
Lessons from the Past
- USA & Caribbean 2024: Famously known for expensive broadcasting. Commuting between the USA and Caribbean islands was costly, disconnecting fans.
- Caribbean 2010: A success story—balanced, vibrant, remembered fondly.
- Caribbean 2007: A disaster—poor organization, inflated costs, and a tournament “flushed down the drain.”
- Conclusion: Caribbean tournaments have always been win‑or‑loss. They remind us that cricket’s soul lies in diversity, not monopoly.
Monopoly vs Multilateralism
Just like global politics today—USA camp vs Chinese‑Russian camp—monopoly is unsustainable. India secures 30+% of ICC revenue, Pakistan barely 5+. India built a broadcasting consortium (Star for ICC, Sony for ACC), making themselves unmovable. Credit where it’s due: India played its “hukum‑ka‑ekka,” a checkmate move.
But Pakistan cannot remain passive. We must invest in our own chain sprocket instead of waiting for new legs. National interest demands initiative.
Learning from South Africa’s Apartheid Era
South Africa, under apartheid, built an economy and environment under immense pressure. They even advised BCCI to sell broadcasting rights to TWI—transforming India’s cricket economy. Until then, BCCI was paying Doordarshan to air games. That reversal was revolutionary.
Pakistan must learn from this: create teams of thinkers, applicators, and compliance assurers. Without this war‑time construction, we will remain reactive instead of proactive.
Karachi’s Traffic Analogy: Convenience vs Meritocracy
As a Karachi‑wala, I see the same flaw in our cricket governance that I see in our traffic. We go “wrong‑way” for convenience, thinking we save time. But in reality, we ruin the system—hostile traffic, wasted minutes, chaos.
Similarly, in cricket, we compromise meritocracy for convenience. We put the wrong person in the wrong spot at the wrong time. This is unfair to prospects. Not everyone can be a hitter, not everyone can be a match finisher, not everyone can be an innings builder.
Reducing Pressure on Babar Azam
Babar Azam cannot be a one‑glove‑fits‑all solution. He should not carry the burden of being hitter, finisher, and builder simultaneously. Instead, Pakistan must adopt a matrix‑based backup system:
- If 11 players are on the field, the squad of 15 must have equally qualified backups for each role.
- Every role—opener, anchor, finisher, bowler—must have redundancy.
- This is scientific, electronic, and humanistic management combined.
Constructing Ourselves vs Seeking Validation
Most importantly, Pakistan must construct itself. This is more vital than chasing validation from ICC, broadcasters, or even rival boards. Respect and dignity cannot be outsourced—they must be built internally.
- Build our own broadcasting leverage.
- Create war‑time construction teams.
- Reduce dependency on external validation.
- Invest in meritocracy and backup systems.
Convenience has ruined Karachi’s traffic. Convenience has ruined Pakistan’s cricket meritocracy. It is time to stop chasing shortcuts and start building systems.
Final Word
India’s checkmate move reshaped cricket’s economy. But Pakistan must stop being a pawn. Respect is not earned by playing India—it’s earned by refusing to be played, by constructing ourselves, and by reclaiming dignity through initiative.
The real question is: will Pakistan continue to seek validation outside, or will it finally build its own foundation with war‑time construction and self‑reliance?
