India’s Manufactured Superiority vs Pakistan’s Discredited Achievements

📰 Misreporting Pakistan Down, Inflating India Up

The EU DisinfoLab’s 2020 “Indian Chronicles” report exposed how the Srivastava Group systematically misreported facts to elevate India while undermining Pakistan.

• Pakistan’s achievements in diplomacy, cricket, and resilience were either ignored or twisted into failures.
• India’s position was exaggerated—painted as the “global voice of democracy” and the superior cricketing nation, even when statistics told a different story.

---

Comparative Analysis: Facts vs Fiction

Area	Pakistan’s Reality	India’s Misreporting via Srivastava Group
Diplomacy	Pakistan raised legitimate concerns in UN forums.	Fake NGOs & media outlets discredited Pakistan, presenting India as the responsible democracy.
Cricket Economics	PCB earns ~5.75% of ICC revenues, still commands global attention in India–Pakistan matches.	India inflated its dominance, highlighting BCCI’s ~40% ICC revenue share as proof of superiority.
Symbolic Power	Pakistan’s victories resonate emotionally with fans worldwide.	Narratives framed Pakistan as weak, India as the “only powerhouse.”
Media Presence	Pakistan’s voice marginalized in EU/UN coverage.	600+ fake outlets amplified India’s image, silencing Pakistan’s achievements.

---

How Pakistan Was Discredited

• Selective Silence: Pakistan’s wins in cricket and diplomacy were erased from coverage.
• Twisted Narratives: Achievements reframed as failures, resilience painted as desperation.
• Filmy Framing: India–Pakistan cricket matches turned into Bollywood melodramas, with India cast as the hero and Pakistan as the villain.

---

Who Benefited?

• Indian Political Establishment: Diplomatic leverage by presenting India as superior.
• BCCI & Corporates: Monopoly over ICC revenues, sponsorship dominance.
• Indian Media Houses: Profits from sensationalism and inflated narratives.
• Srivastava Group: Influence and financial gain from running the disinformation machine.
• Pakistan (Ironically): Exposure of manipulation validated Pakistan’s claims of being unfairly targeted.

---

Why Pakistan Must Respond

This is high time for Pakistan to:

• Claim Credit: Reassert its achievements in cricket and diplomacy.
• Counter Manipulation: Research who benefits from these narratives and expose the machinery.
• Reframe the Story: Replace India’s misreporting with evidence‑based accounts of Pakistan’s resilience.

---

Final Word

India tried to play the Game of Thrones in cricket and geopolitics—using the Srivastava Group to misreport itself as superior and discredit Pakistan’s achievements. The EU DisinfoLab exposed the fraud: 600 fake outlets, resurrected NGOs, stolen identities.

The ultimate beneficiary isn’t India—it’s the disinformation industry, thriving on lies. Pakistan’s challenge now is clear: flip the script, reclaim the narrative, and demand respect—on the field and off it.

---

---

Share

ICC’s Spirit of Cricket or Spirit of Monopoly?

---

Pakistan’s irritation with ICC’s hypocrisy is justified. India has refused to play in Pakistan multiple times without sanction, yet when Pakistan’s government directs PCB to boycott India in the T20 World Cup 2026, ICC threatens “consequences.” This exposes the commercial monopoly of the India‑Pakistan fixture and the hollow rhetoric of “Spirit of Cricket.”

---

I. ICC’s Hollow Rhetoric

The ICC loves to preach about the “Spirit of Cricket”—fairness, neutrality, equal treatment. Yet the reality is different. India has refused to play in Pakistan during the Asia Cup 2023 and Champions Trophy 2025, and ICC bent over backwards to accommodate them. No sanctions, no forfeits, no fines.

Now, when Pakistan’s government issues a directive not to play India in the 2026 T20 World Cup, ICC suddenly discovers its rulebook and warns PCB of “consequences.” This is not about integrity—it is about protecting the commercial monopoly of the India‑Pakistan clash, the most lucrative fixture in world cricket.

---

II. Pakistan’s Irritation is Justified

• Bangladesh refused to play in India citing security concerns. ICC removed them from the tournament. Pakistan supported Bangladesh’s request for an alternate venue and accused ICC of double standards.
• PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi rightly said the government will decide Pakistan’s participation. This is sovereignty, not defiance.
• ICC’s selective enforcement proves it is biased towards India, because India controls the broadcast economy and sponsorship monopoly.

---

III. Monopoly vs Competition

• Since 2012, ICC has ensured India and Pakistan are always in the same group, purely to maximise broadcast revenue.
• Pakistan once competed with Singapore‑based Star Network, which gave visibility. Today, Star is owned by India, and Pakistan has not built a competing broadcast platform.
• Without competition, ICC bends to India’s demands and pressures Pakistan. Monopoly is the real disease.

---

IV. Meritocracy and Succession Planning

Pakistan must not only fight ICC’s hypocrisy but also rebuild its own cricket economy.

• Australia’s succession model—Steve Waugh → Ricky Ponting → Michael Clarke → Steve Smith → Pat Cummins—shows how meritocracy sustains dominance.
• Pakistan suffers from succession gaps and indecision. Leadership changes are reactive, often politically influenced.
• If Babar Azam knows his backup is ready, he will stay on top of his matrix. That competitive environment is meritocracy. Without it, we create “nepokids” and inconsistency.

---

V. Reflection / Lesson

• ICC’s warning is not about rules—it is about money.
• Pakistan’s irritation is justified: ICC respects Indian government directives but threatens Pakistan for the same.
• The solution lies in ignoring India’s provocations, rebuilding Pakistan’s sports economy, and documenting ICC’s double standards.
• Self‑respect is defended through branding, meritocracy, and principled documentation, not by bowing to monopoly.
  

---

---

Share

Obedience Ends Here

---

Pakistan vs India: Enough of Obedience

Respect or Nothing

India has long dictated the terms of cricketing engagement, treating Pakistan as if our presence is optional but our obedience mandatory. Bilateral series are cancelled at their whim, neutral venues imposed, respect denied. Yet when the World Cup arrives, Pakistan is expected to show up, generate billions, and keep the spectacle alive. This imbalance cannot continue. Respect is not a favour—it is the foundation of rivalry.

Mockery is Not Rivalry

On Indian national TV, Pakistanis are ridiculed, dismissed, and mocked as if our dignity is expendable. For years, Pakistan’s response has been silence. But silence is not diplomacy—it is surrender. Rivalry cannot survive on humiliation. If India wants the rivalry, it must treat Pakistan as an equal, not a punchline.

Boycott as a Message

The PCB’s hint at boycotting the February clash has rattled India and the ICC alike. Indian media screamed about losses worth ₹4500 crore. That figure alone exposes the truth: Pakistan is not a side character, it is the backbone of the rivalry. Without Pakistan, the “biggest match in cricket” collapses into a hollow spectacle. Boycott is not weakness—it is a message that Pakistan’s dignity is non-negotiable.

Cricket Without Dignity is Humiliation

Critics warn that boycotting will hurt Pakistan’s credibility. But credibility without dignity is worthless. Playing under insult is not cricket—it is humiliation dressed as sport. Pakistan must show the world that respect is the price of participation.

Breaking the Cycle

This is bigger than one match. It is about breaking the cycle where India dictates and Pakistan obeys. It is about telling the ICC that Pakistan’s participation cannot be taken for granted. It is about showing fans that their pride matters as much as their passion.

Final Word

Pakistan vs India is the heartbeat of world cricket. But a heartbeat without dignity is lifeless. If India continues to ridicule Pakistan while refusing respect, then Pakistan has every right to walk away. Enough of obedience. Enough of silence. Cricket must be played on equal terms—or not at all.

---

---

Share

Pakistan’s Boycott: A Statistical Reality Check

---

Pakistan’s boycott stance is not rhetoric—it is backed by hard numbers. The India–Pakistan cricket fixture is valued at over ₹4,500 crore, ICC’s revenue model is skewed with India taking 38.5% while Pakistan gets less than 5%, and history shows boycotts have reshaped cricket’s moral compass. When Arnab Goswami dismisses Pakistan’s position as a “joke,” he ignores the statistics that prove otherwise.

---

💰 Financial Impact of India–Pakistan Matches

• Commercial Value: The India–Pakistan T20 World Cup fixture is valued at USD 500 million (₹4,500 crore) in broadcast rights, sponsorships, ticket sales, and advertising. No other match in the tournament comes close in commercial impact.
• Advertising Losses: Broadcasters stand to lose ₹300 crore in ad revenue if the fixture is canceled.
• ICC Contracts at Risk: Pakistan earns USD 34.5 million annually from ICC distributions, but the credibility of ICC contracts is jeopardized if Pakistan withdraws from fixtures against India. NDTV Sports ndtvprofit.com Zee News

---

📊 ICC Revenue Distribution (2024–27 Cycle)

Country	Share of ICC Revenue	Annual Earnings (USD)	Notes
India	38.5%	~$230 million	Dominates ICC’s commercial contribution
England	6.89%	~$41 million	Second-highest contributor
Australia	6.25%	~$37 million	Consistent tours
Pakistan	2.81%	~$34.5 million	Despite enabling fixtures worth 10x more

Key Point: Pakistan’s share is disproportionately low compared to the commercial value its matches generate.

---

📅 Historic Precedents of Boycotts in Cricket

• South Africa (1970–1991): Banned from world cricket due to apartheid.
• Zimbabwe (2003): Faced boycotts over political turmoil.
• India (2016 & 2019): Boycotted Pakistani actors and cricketers post-Uri and Pulwama attacks, amplified by Arnab Goswami’s own campaigns (#PleaseBoycott).
• Pakistan (2023 Asia Cup): Official host, yet India refused to tour, forcing a hybrid model that undermined Pakistan’s sovereignty.

---

📺 Arnab Goswami’s Contradictions in Numbers

• 2016: Led campaigns to boycott Pakistani actors in Bollywood.
• 2019: Amplified calls to boycott Pakistan in cricket after Pulwama.
• 2026: Now dismisses Pakistan’s boycott stance as a “joke,” despite the fixture’s ₹4,500 crore valuation.

Quotable Line: “Boycott is patriotism when India does it, but a joke when Pakistan does? #DoubleStandards”

---

⚖️ Respect Must Be Reciprocal

• India has not played a bilateral series with Pakistan since 2012, citing political reasons.
• Pakistan has hosted England, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa safely in recent years under strict security protocols.
• If India refuses to play in Pakistan, Pakistan reserves the right to boycott matches in India.

---

Conclusion

Pakistan’s boycott stance is statistically justified. It is not about ego—it is about ₹4,500 crore in lost revenue, skewed ICC distributions, and decades of precedent where boycotts reshaped cricket’s ethics. Arnab Goswami’s dismissal ignores the numbers that prove Pakistan’s position is rooted in principle and fairness.

In cricket, as in economics, respect is not requested—it is demanded. Pakistan’s boycott is a reminder that dignity is non-negotiable.

---

---

Share