I. The Real Issue
This is not about one trophy or one viral clip. It is about Pakistan’s self‑respect, cricket economy, and narrative building. When Indian anchors like Vikrant Gupta mock Pakistanis by saying “they lack sportsmen spirit” or “they will U‑turn and play India again,” it is not casual banter. It is part of a structured propaganda pattern designed to humiliate Pakistan internationally.
II. Analysis
- Platforms like Apex Sports amplify this ridicule, which directly connects to the EU DisinfoLab’s 2020 Indian Chronicles report. That report exposed how India built a consortium of fake NGOs and media outlets to systematically discredit Pakistan.
- Pakistan failed to sustain its cricket economy:
- In 1992, Australian grounds carried Pakistani advertisements.
- Pakistani bats were used worldwide—the last big name being England’s captain Eoin Morgan.
- After that, we stopped aggressively promoting our products, while India expanded its broadcast and branding globally.
- Monopoly leads to weakness:
- Pakistan once competed with Singapore‑based Star Network, which gave us visibility.
- Today, Star Network is owned by India, and Pakistan has not built a competing broadcast or media house of equal scale.
- Without competition, India monopolizes cricket’s narrative, leaving Pakistan defensive.
III. Manifesto
- India broke diplomatic norms and set wrong precedents, but Pakistan also erred by not building its cricket economy and broadcast strength.
- Our self‑respect must never be compromised. Instead, we must show the world that Pakistan’s cricket industry and sportsmen spirit are alive through meritocracy and branding.
- Documentation and principled stances are essential, but equally important is aggressive promotion of our products, our broadcast, and our narrative.
- Competition is survival: Pakistan must invest in its own sports media and branding platforms to break India’s monopoly.
IV. Succession Gaps vs Australia’s Meritocracy
- Australia built a seamless succession model: Steve Waugh → Ricky Ponting → Michael Clarke → Steve Smith → Pat Cummins. Each leader replaced the previous without drama, keeping performance at the highest level.
- Pakistan, by contrast, suffers from gaps and indecision. Leadership changes often come late, reactive, or politically influenced.
- If Babar Azam knows his backup is ready, he will stay on top of his matrix. That competitive environment is meritocracy. Without it, we create “nepokids” and inconsistency.
- Meritocracy ensures respect at home, which blocks ridicule abroad.
V. Reflection / Lesson
- Propaganda and ridicule can only be countered with evidence and merit‑based performance.
- If Pakistan rebuilds its cricket economy, broadcast, and competitive environment, biased comparisons lose credibility.
- Self‑respect is not maintained by compromise—it is maintained by branding, meritocracy, competition, and principled documentation.
🧭 Final Word: India has institutionalized propaganda and monopolized cricket’s broadcast economy. Pakistan neglected competition and branding, which is why we are shown as defensive. The real answer is not reaction—it is rebuilding Pakistan’s sports economy, competitive media, and meritocracy so that propaganda collapses under the weight of our own integrity.
No comments:
Post a Comment