Pakistan’s Cosmetic Cricket Obsession: A Critical Look
In a nation where cricket is not just a sport but a sacred ritual, one might expect the Pakistan Cricket
Board (PCB) to wield its authority with the foresight of a seasoned captain plotting a Test match victory. Instead, Pakistan’s cricket management seems to have perfected the art of cosmetic changes—those glitzy, superficial tweaks that dazzle momentarily but leave the game’s soul craving substance. From renaming stadiums to shuffling chairmen faster than a street magician’s card trick, the PCB’s approach often feels like polishing a cricket bat with lipstick and calling it a strategy. Why this obsession with appearances over actions that secure the future? And what drives the PCB to prioritise quick fixes over lasting impact? Let’s step onto the pitch with a satirical smirk and a critical eye, dissecting the intentions behind these decisions.
The Great Stadium Rename Game
Imagine the National Stadium in Karachi, where legends like Imran Khan and Viv Richards once carved their names into cricket lore, receiving a grand makeover. New stands? A state-of-the-art training facility? Nope—just a new name: National Bank Cricket Arena (ESPNcricinfo). Because nothing says “we’re ready for global cricket” like a shiny new signboard, right? In a city of over 15 million, Karachi leans on this single venue for top-tier matches, while cities like Mumbai boast multiple grounds like Wankhede and Brabourne, and London juggles Lord’s and The Oval. Pakistan’s major hubs—Karachi, Lahore, Faisalabad, Multan—each rely on one primary international stadium, leaving players and fans grappling with overbooked schedules and worn-out pitches.
This fixation on cosmetic changes isn’t limited to names. Minor upgrades, like a fresh coat of paint or a snazzy scoreboard, often trump the construction of new venues or the enhancement of existing ones to international standards. The PCB seems convinced that a polished facade can hide the creaking infrastructure beneath. But as any cricket fan knows, a fancy pavilion doesn’t help when the outfield is patchy or the facilities are stuck in the 90s.
PSL Scheduling: A Cosmetic Calendar
The Pakistan Super League (PSL), Pakistan’s crown jewel, is a microcosm of this cosmetic approach. With six teams—Lahore Qalandars, Karachi Kings, Multan Sultans, Islamabad United, Peshawar Zalmi, and Quetta Gladiators—each is meant to play 10 games in a double round-robin format: five at home, five away (PSL Schedule). Sounds fair, logical, and straightforward. But in the 2025 season, teams like Multan Sultans, Lahore Qalandars, Karachi Kings, and Islamabad United bask in their full five home games, while Peshawar Zalmi and Quetta Gladiators are shortchanged with only four each. It’s as if the PCB decided fairness is a suggestion, not a rule.
Why the imbalance? Venue constraints are likely culprits. Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium serves as home for both Islamabad United and Peshawar Zalmi, while Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore hosts Quetta Gladiators’ “home” games alongside Lahore Qalandars’ (PSL Venues). The result is a scheduling tangle that feels hastily assembled to tick a box rather than to optimise the tournament. Picture telling Babar Azam he’s missing a home game because the stadium’s booked—hardly the unity and discipline Quaid-e-Azam envisioned.
Don’t get me wrong: the PSL is no failure. It’s revitalised Pakistani cricket, blending international stars with local talent in a T20 spectacle. But when the schedule undermines basic fairness, it’s hard to see it as anything but a cosmetic exercise—pretty on paper, messy in practice.
The Lost Decade: 2009–2019
Rewind to 2009, a grim chapter for Pakistani cricket. A terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan team bus near Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore sent shockwaves through the cricketing world (Cricket in Pakistan). International teams refused to tour, forcing Pakistan to play “home” matches in the UAE, primarily Dubai and Abu Dhabi. For a decade, the passionate roars of Pakistani crowds were replaced by the sterile hum of desert stadiums.
The PCB deserves applause for keeping cricket alive during this exile. Launching the PSL in 2016, initially in the UAE, was a bold move, showcasing Pakistan’s cricketing prowess and proving it could host high-profile events (Pakistan Super League). Incremental security improvements paved the way for cricket’s return, starting with Zimbabwe’s 2015 tour and culminating in Sri Lanka’s 2019 Test series (Cricket’s Return).
But here’s the rub: did the PCB do enough to prepare for cricket’s homecoming? While it focused on keeping the national team competitive, infrastructure development lagged. New stadiums could have been built, existing ones upgraded, or grassroots programs expanded to nurture talent. Instead, the priority seemed to be surviving the crisis rather than planning a triumphant return. South Africa, isolated during apartheid, invested in domestic structures and emerged stronger when international cricket resumed. Pakistan, by contrast, seems to have missed a golden opportunity to rebuild its cricketing foundation.
The PCB’s Musical Chairs
If there’s one arena where Pakistan excels in cosmetic change, it’s the PCB’s leadership carousel. Since 2022, the chairmanship has ping-ponged from Ramiz Raja to Najam Sethi, to Zaka Ashraf, back to Najam Sethi, and now to Mohsin Naqvi (Pakistan Cricket Team). Each new face arrives with a new logo, a new slogan, or a new “vision,” often tossing the previous one’s plans into the dustbin. It’s as if the PCB believes a fresh chairman is the key to cricketing glory, rather than, say, a consistent, long-term strategy.
The root cause? The Prime Minister’s role as Patron-in-Chief, which allows political influence to dictate PCB appointments. When governments change, so do the PCB’s leaders, creating a cycle of disruption that stifles progress. Mohsin Naqvi, the current chairman, has made some strides, like upgrading stadiums for the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy (Champions Trophy). But critics argue that many of his actions, like cosmetic renovations, prioritize optics over substance. An independent PCB, free from political meddling, could emulate the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and focus on sustainable growth.
KPK’s Beacon of Hope
Amid this sea of superficial fixes, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) shines like a beacon of hope. The provincial government is developing not one but two international-standard stadiums in Peshawar: Arbab Niaz Stadium and Hayatabad Cricket Stadium (Hayatabad Stadium). With capacities of over 30,000 and 10,000, respectively, these venues promise to bring top-tier cricket to the region, nurture local talent, and ease pressure on other stadiums. Hayatabad Stadium, recently upgraded to ICC standards, is set to host PSL matches, proving that vision and investment can deliver (Hayatabad Completion).
Why can’t other provinces follow suit? Karachi, with its sprawling population, could use a second international venue to complement the National Stadium. Lahore’s iconic Gaddafi Stadium could benefit from a partner ground. Faisalabad’s Iqbal Stadium and Multan’s Cricket Stadium are solid, but additional venues could transform these cities into cricketing hubs. KPK’s model shows that building multiple stadiums in one city is not just feasible but vital for the sport’s growth.
The PCB’s Side of the Story: Intentions Behind the Facade
Before we dismiss the PCB as mere purveyors of cosmetic change, let’s give them a moment in the spotlight to explain their side. After all, even in cricket’s chaotic world, things aren’t always as they seem.
Stadium Renaming: More Than Meets the Eye
The renaming of the National Stadium to National Bank Cricket Arena might look like a superficial stunt, but there’s more to it. In October 2022, the PCB inked a five-year naming rights deal with the National Bank of Pakistan, the first of its kind in the country (ESPNcricinfo). This isn’t just about a new name; it’s about securing sponsorship revenue to fund cricket development, including grassroots initiatives. The PCB and NBP have pledged to collaborate on scouting talent in rural areas, potentially opening doors for young players. While the name change may seem cosmetic, it’s a financial lifeline with deeper implications.
PSL Scheduling: A Game of Numbers and Crowds
PSL scheduling isn’t just a random draw. The PCB juggles venue availability, logistical constraints, and fan engagement metrics. In PSL 2025, Karachi hosted only five matches due to lower crowd turnout in previous seasons (myKhel). By prioritizing venues with higher attendance, the PCB aims to maximize revenue and keep the league financially viable. It’s a pragmatic, if imperfect, balancing act between competitive fairness and fiscal sense.
Infrastructure Development: Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place
From 2009 to 2019, when international cricket shunned Pakistan due to security concerns, the PCB faced a tough call. Building new stadiums might have seemed like a risky bet with no guarantee of teams returning. Instead, the focus was on keeping the national team competitive and managing “home” games in the UAE, which demanded significant resources. Financial constraints, worsened by events like the COVID-19 pandemic, further limited infrastructure investments (ESPNcricinfo). Hindsight is 20/20, but the PCB was navigating a minefield.
Leadership Musical Chairs: A Political Sport
The revolving door of PCB chairmen is the poster child for political interference. With each new government comes a new chairman, often chosen for political ties rather than cricketing expertise, leading to instability and short-term priorities. Former players like Mohammad Hafeez have called it out, noting that the chairman’s appointment is “always based on political background” (Cricket Pakistan). Until this cycle breaks, sustainable planning remains a pipe dream.
In short, the PCB’s actions, while often appearing cosmetic, are shaped by financial necessities, logistical hurdles, and political pressures. These constraints don’t absolve the shortcomings, but they offer context for why Pakistani cricket sometimes feels stuck in a loop of superficial fixes.
A Call for Substance Over Style
Pakistan’s love for cricket is unrivalled, yet its management often feels like a highlight reel of cosmetic changes—new names, new faces, new logos, but not enough new stadiums or ideas. The PSL’s scheduling quirks, the missed opportunities of 2009–2019, and the PCB’s leadership merry-go-round point to a deeper issue: a preference for quick fixes over long-term vision. As the great Inzamam-ul-Haq might say, “Boys, we need to think about the future, not just the next press conference.”
What’s the way forward? First, invest in infrastructure—build more international-standard stadiums in major cities, following KPK’s lead. Second, ensure fair PSL scheduling, giving every team an equal shot at home glory. Third, grant the PCB true independence, freeing it from political whims. And finally, draw inspiration from South Africa, which turned adversity into opportunity through strategic planning.
In a nation where cricket is a religion, it’s time to stop rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic and build a ship that sails into the future. You can rename a stadium all you want, but if it’s the only one in town, you’re still playing catch-up. Let’s make Pakistani cricket not just a pretty face but a powerhouse with the substance to match its passion.
Key Statistics
| City |
Primary Stadium |
Capacity |
Additional International Venues |
| Karachi |
National Bank Cricket Arena |
30,000 |
None |
| Lahore |
Gaddafi Stadium |
34,000 |
None |
| Faisalabad |
Iqbal Stadium |
18,000 |
None |
| Multan |
Multan Cricket Stadium |
30,000 |
None |
| Peshawar |
Arbab Niaz Stadium |
30,000+ |
Hayatabad Cricket Stadium (10,000) |
PSL 2025 Home Games Allocation
| Team |
Home Venue |
Home Games |
| Multan Sultans |
Multan Cricket Stadium |
5 |
| Lahore Qalandars |
Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore |
5 |
| Karachi Kings |
National Stadium, Karachi |
5 |
| Islamabad United |
Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium |
5 |
| Peshawar Zalmi |
Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium |
4 |
| Quetta Gladiators |
Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore |
4 |
Note: Some teams receive only four home games, highlighting potential scheduling imbalances.
