Friday, January 29, 2010

Thanks Aussies for letting us know our weakness

Mr. Kamran Abbasi rightly stated here
As another dismal chapter closes on Pakistan's senior tour of Australia, another exciting one is about to start for the U19s. There have been few redeeming features of Pakistan's cricket since the failure in the Sydney Test, and Mohammad Yousuf's deluded assertion that his team have performed better than teams of the past is a hollow boast.
The evidence to disprove him has beamed to every corner of the globe. Unfortunately, Yousuf's dread philospohies have alarmed supporters and undoubtedly infected his troops. Mohammad Yousuf's Pakistan have lacked the will to win. They have settled for second best and been content in their failure.
Across the Tasman Sea, a young Pakistan side has shown how the exact opposite attitude can help you exceed expectations. Pakistan U19s may not even be one of the top two teams in the tournament but their spirit, as epitomised by Hammad Azam, has been refreshing. For demonstrating such will to win, Hammad deserves his opportunity in the Twenty20 against the senior Australian team.

Nobody expected Pakistan to beat Australia in the Tests or One-Day Series but the manner of defeat has been unacceptable. Pakistan's consistent success at U19 level over the last decade and more is testament to the talent in the pipeline. What happens in senior cricket that squanders that potential?
Is that the manner, a national side of any sport of any team plays? If that so, there isn't a difference in playing at ground or play at the streets of Karachi. They've shown such attitude on the ground. They should apologize to the whole nation. Cricket like mentioned earlier that its a passion here in Pakistan, people eat drink love this game. They wake-up at nights to watch the toss, some early batting or bowling, even though they've schools colleges universities and offices later but they compromise their sleep for it. When the National Team is being a drama queen so we should not argue with others for making fun of us and insulting by the means of IPL auction snuff.

Its the time now, Cricketers and the Cricket Board should also know they're accountable to the 17 Crore population of the Country. People here in Pakistan are more happy on the efforts of the U-19 National side compared to the Seniors. Atleast they showed some courage to reach the Finals, else even the broadcasters didn't wanna broadcast Pakistan's U-19 matches, and matches of countries like USA, Papua New Guinea, Canada and other teams were preferred on Pakistan's matches, still they proved their worth by reaching into the finals, and even though they lost on the ground but had won the hearts of every Pakistani, in Pakistan and in the whole world.

Unlike the Senior National Cricket team, which raised its funeral in Australia, they showed they're declined even below to the WINDIES who showed much better fight than that of the Green Shirts.

Last but not the least we should thank the Aussies who showed us where we stand.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Pakistan prevail in thrilling climax

Pakistan prevail in thrilling climax

Cricinfo staff
January 23, 2010
Pakistan (Ahsan 30, Aziz 28, Azam 17*, Unadkat 2-26) beat India (Mandeep 40, Fayyaz 4-27) by two wickets
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details
India and Pakistan livened up a contest that, at one stage, was in danger of ending in a washout. Pakistan would have qualified for the semi-finals had the match been abandoned, but they proved they were capable of progressing to the next stage based on performance alone. A combination of quality seam bowling from Fayyaz Butt and some enterprising batting by their middle and lower orders, especially Hammad Azam, sealed a thrilling two-wicket win in the final over in front of a sparse yet boisterous crowd at the Sutcliffe Oval.
More to follow
Innings break India Under-19 114 (Mandeep 40, Fayyaz 4-27) v Pakistan Under-19
A washout would have ensured them a place in the semi-finals but Pakistan proved they were capable of progressing to the next stage based on performance alone. A combination of quality seam bowling, especially by Fayyaz Butt, and some shoddy Indian batting allowed Pakistan to limit their opponents to 114 in a game truncated to 23 overs as a result of persistent rain.
Pakistan's decision to bowl paid off immediately: the first ball of the day, a lovely outswinger from Butt, castled Rahul Kannaur, who played from the crease to a ball he should have dealt with by stepping forward. If poor technique lay at the heart of the first dismissal, a serious lack of maturity brought about the second, as Mayank Agarwal's misplaced aggression caused him to edge one to the keeper just four balls later.
The two Singhs, Mandeep and Harpreet, went about the repair job in difficult conditions - the ball moved around and the outfield was slow. With boundaries proving elusive, they concentrated on rotating the strike and accumulated 40 runs at a healthy rate before Sarmad Bhatti had Harpreet caught behind. The Indian captain Ashok Menaria, though unconvincing for much of his stay, managed a six in another promising partnership before the left-arm spin from Raza Hassan during the batting Powerplay brought about his downfall.
Mandeep then began to accelerate, edging Hammad Azam for a boundary while trying to swing over midwicket and slogging him for three more, but a mistimed pull to mid-on ended his determined knock of 40. A desperate attempt to pose something competitive provided the spark for some innovation as Mandeep, Sufian Shaikh and Gaurav Jathar experimented with the scoop over the wicketkeeper, each with varying results. The only effective surge, however, came from Manan Sharma, who hit 16 off 11, including a six in the final over, but Fayyaz cleaned up the last two wickets to finish with a four-for.
Atlast something to cheer about!!! The way earlier they played, it seemed Indians will steam roll Pakistanis but the way later order played, left some pride

Saturday, January 23, 2010

New captain after Australia tour - Ijaz Butt

Pakistan will have a new captain after their tour of Australia comes to an end in early February, Ijaz Butt, the PCB chairman, has said. Mohammad Yousuf was appointed to lead in New Zealand and Australia after Younis Khan quit in a huff back in November.
"This captain [Mohammad Yousuf] was for this series only and we will decide after the tour of Australia about the captain, [but] we will change," Butt told the private ARY News channel.
Under Yousuf, Pakistan squared a three-Test series against New Zealand but lost three Tests in a row to Australia before they surrendered the first ODI in Brisbane today. The relationship between Yousuf and the selection committee, headed by Iqbal Qasim, has been tense over the course of the long tour of Australia. He had Misbah-ul-Haq sent over to New Zealand after the player had been dropped from all three formats of the game just a month before.
Butt termed Younis' decision to relinquish the captaincy as unfortunate for Pakistan. "We did not change Younis. Unfortunately the sports committee of the parliament made him run away after they levelled match-fixing allegations against him," he said.
Butt squashed the match-fixing allegations against Pakistan after the Champions Trophy, in specific the game against Australia in which they lost by one run off the last ball. "How can someone fix a match on the last ball? Only a magician can do that and on this allegation Younis was mentally disturbed and resigned," Butt said. "Younis was a good captain but he was hurt on the allegations and quit. Now we will soon decide about the change."
Pakistan's next Test assignment is in England where they play Australia, a series shifted out of Pakistan over security fears. They are scheduled to play four Tests against England on the same tour.
What the hell is going on here, we're changing captains like I change my trousers everyday on. Whats this going on, I don't think which captain are they looking for after sacking Younis Khan. I suppose Afridi would be the candidate for the new captain, which would be a wise choice as he and Younis has the tendency to create a fighting spirit. So best of luck for it. Experimenting with MoYo was a complete waste of time.

Pakistan can improve ODI ranking in series against Australia

Pakistan can improve ODI ranking in series against Australia

LAHORE: Pakistan can improve their ranking on the ICC One-day International table when they face Australia in a five-match series, which began in Brisbane on Friday.

While Australia lead second-ranked India by nine ratings points, Pakistan are at seventh position with 108 ratings points and four behind fourth-placed New Zealand. If Pakistan win the series by 3-2 or better, they will go up to fourth but would stay in seventh position in case of their failure to win a single match in the series while dropping four ratings points behind sixth-placed Sri Lanka.

In case of a 3-2 series win, Pakistan will earn four ratings points which will put them along side New Zealand on 112 ratings points but ahead of Daniel Vettori’s side by a fraction of the point.

A 4-1 series win will put Pakistan on 115 ratings points whereas a clean sweep will take them to 118 ratings points, one behind third-placed South Africa.

Even if Australia win the series 3-2, Pakistan will improve their rating by two places as they will leapfrog England and Sri Lanka into fifth place on 110 ratings points.

In contrast, Australia will retain their number-one position even if they lose all the matches of the series though they will drop to 123 ratings points but will earn three ratings points if they finish unbeaten in the series.

The odds are in favour of Australia as they have won 14 out of the last 20 ODIs against Pakistan who have won only five. On a head-to-head in Australia, Ricky Ponting’s side enjoy a 27-16 advantage with a tied game and one no-result while overall Australia have won 47 out of the 80 ODIs with Pakistan winning 29, one ending in a tie and three no-results.

In the ICC Player Rankings for ODI batsmen, Pakistan Mohammad Yousuf is the only batsman in the top 20 on 15th position which he shares with South Africa’s Herschelle Gibbs.

Outside the top 20 and eyeing an upward movement like their captain are Shoaib Malik (24th), Salman Butt (26th), Younus Khan (33rd), Misbah-ul-Haq (38th), Kamran Akmal (44th), Umar Akmal (56th) and Shahid Afridi (59th).

In the ICC Player Rankings for ODI bowlers, Shahid is the highest-ranked bowler from either side on 12th position. The other Pakistan bowler in the top 20 is off-spinner Saeed Ajmal on 17th spot. Shahid has a good opportunity not only to regain return to the top 10 but also improve his previous best ranking of eighth as he trails sixth-placed Harbhajan Singh of India by 19 points.

Other bowlers outside the top 20 and aiming to improve their rankings are James Hopes (26th), Umar Gul (27th), Shane Watson (30th), Mohammad Asif (44th) and Rana Navedul Hasan (56th).


Lets hope so something like that, as I personally think there won't be a chance like that, k Pakistan wins the series comprehensively.

T20 leagues ‘a virus’, says Miandad

KARACHI: Former Pakistani international batsman Javed Miandad on Thursday warned lucrative Twenty20 leagues were “a virus” which threatened to kill off Test cricket.
Miandad said the leagues offered such good money that playing international cricket — particularly the long form of the game — was becoming less attractive, calling on the International Cricket Council (ICC) to step in.
“Twenty20 cricket is a virus and if the ICC doesn’t restrict matches of this format it will finish Test cricket as leading players will no longer want to play for their country,” Miandad, who played 124 Tests for Pakistan, told AFP.
“Some of the Australian players could have represented their country longer but retired to play T20 leagues two years ago,” Miandad said.
“When Twenty20 cricket started I had smelled this format will damage cricket, now the game will not see quality players as they are now more attuned to play the big-hitting game than the traditional and classical way.
“With the introduction of Twenty20 leagues, the notion that ‘country comes first’ is also hit for six because when there is a choice between national duty and more money, players will choose money.
“I sincerely pray that T20 cricket is restricted, otherwise the game will suffer badly.”
Miandad’s reaction came after 11 Pakistani players were snubbed at the IPL player auction in Mumbai on Tuesday.
In my opinion, why can't we take it that way that instead of taking solid steps, like organizing of similar sort of tournaments like IPL, we were just busy giving statements and doing nothing in practical. This is where we lag and where India scored. We all know, since a decade we've capitalize on the Indians, now when they're in power its an understood thing that they'll return you the same! So why that much wobble, and plus taking strong actions like making 2 separate teams for Test and ODI cum T20 module, we're content with what we've got.

Plus emerging of patriotism is the responsibility of the elders, when there would be sense of patriotism, there won't be something like that.

You've to work hard for to develop a player and to develop its weakness into its strong point, but here we're running away from the hard-work and just contented with the usage of available resources without any planning for the future.

I must agree there must be some limitations in playing of T20
Peace!

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Some voices from India!

No Pakistani in IPL is a matter of shame
Avijit Ghosh, 20 January 2010, 04:53 PM IST


Pakistan are the current T20 world champions. Shahid Afridi, Umar Gul, Mohammed Aamer, Saeed Ajmal and company played some enthralling cricket to claim the trophy last year. Since then, Pakistan have seen another exciting batsman emerge on the horizon: Umar Akmal. Therefore, it defies logic that nobody wanted to buy the 11 Pakistani players in the IPL 3 auction on Tuesday.

What's the reason? Let us go through what has been proffered by the men and women involved with IPL. Some team owners have said that the Pakistani players had a problem of availability during the period. That's nonsense. Unlike the top Aussie players, they are available for the entire duration. In fact, West Indian Kemar Roach, a Deccan Chargers buy, will miss the first two games. That's because the Zimbabwe tour of West Indies gets over on March 14 while IPL 3 begins on March 12. The second Deccan Chargers game will be held on March 14.

Another gentleman was heard mouthing that the Pakistanis were not chosen because this was a short auction. There were too few players to be bought, he said. This logic doesn't hold either. The truth is that the owners spent sums as high as $720,000 and $610,000 for the likes of Parnell and Roach, while ignoring Aamer and Gul. Are we saying that the former two are better bowlers than Aamer (who is also emerging as a handy bat) and Gul? Or that the Pakistanis are not even worth $100,000? And have we forgotten that Afridi was the man of the series in the T20 World Cup 2009.

One logic being offered is that franchisees were not keen to have Pakistani players because there is an element of uncertainty involving them. Simply put, the relationship between the two countries is already edgy and could always get worse. In that case, the Pakistani players might go back. So why take the trouble?

Even this argument is specious. Sure, nobody would want to invest a huge amount in a 'risky' player. But then isn't investing over $750,000 in Keiron Pollard any less risky? What's the guarantee he will succeed? What about investing $750,000-plus in Bond, once a great bowler, now extremely injury prone. Let us not forget he's currently injured too. Besides, he is 30-plus and certainly not as quick as he used to be. Surely investing $300,000 or whatever in Mohammed Aamer would have been less risky - even though nobody can ever rule out problems in relations between the two countries. In a squad of 20-plus players, surely that was worth the risk.


Undeniably this is a shameful episode in Indian cricket history. And if it is a question of politics, then Indian authorities should have been upfront and open about it. Lalit Modi should at least say sorry to the Pakistani players. That's only in the fitness of things. It would be great if those who are proactive about peace in the Indian government ensure that Pakistani players are able to play in IPL 3.


Most of the current Australian players will be missing out on IPL 3 due to international assignments. Now, if we don't have any player from the champion T20 side in the world, then IPL 3 will indeed be vastly devalued.


Without the Pakistani players, Modi and company can still have the spectacle. But for me, IPL 3 will be nothing more than a bonfire of corporate vanities.

_________________________


IPL franchisees are right in ignoring Pak players
Rajesh Kalra, 21 January 2010, 02:03 PM IST

The media has been relentless in panning the IPL franchisees for ignoring Pakistan players for the third installment of Indian Premier League. Commentators and intellectual columnists have uniformly cried foul over this shameful omission.

My take on this, however, is different. Whether there was an understanding between the franchisees before the bid began, or the government nudged the franchisees to ignore Pak players is irrelevant, really. Given the mood in the nation, I think having players from across the border makes little sense, at least not for the franchisees.

I am not for a moment saying the Pakistani players are bad or do not have a fan following here. On the contrary, they regularly produce some of the most talented, and watchable, players in the world, so what if they play irresponsibly at times, and then surprise everyone with sterling performances that border genius. But the ground reality is different.

We all know the fan following in the current scenario is fickle. Fans may adore someone, but one brutal attack in Kashmir or elsewhere will change the situation diametrically in a jiffy. Now, if I am a franchisee who has invested in a Pakistani player, why would I risk it? And it is not just risking the franchisee’s reputation, it is even risking the safety of players from all over the world, on the ground, in the hotel where they stay and while they travel. Why would a franchisee invest heavily in a great player if the wrongdoings by his country somewhere works against his interest? The franchisee, after all is investing in these teams for brand building, not negative publicity.

Even from the organisers and government’s point of view, not having players from Pakistan helps. Sporting events are organized so that there is great competition and everyone enjoys a good contest. But if that contest has even a small chance of endangering spectators and players safety, it is not a risk worth taking.

Now back to Pakistani players, I once again reiterate that they are among the best in the game, and to be fair to them, the way the auctions were held was unsavoury. Here, assuming that the IPL or the government was instrumental in nudging franchisees not to bid for Shahid Afridi and others, as a respect to the sportspersons at least, it should have been handled differently. Instead of including them among the players available and then ‘humiliating’ them, they should have simply said, sorry, given the current scenario, we are unable to welcome you for the IPL. It would have hurt too, but less.

Ultimately, as I said, it is the franchisee that is spending and if he feels it does not help his brand, he would not. In that context therefore, it would help if Pakistani politicians stop the rhetoric that says this is India’s attempt to derail the peace process.
__________________


Inside story: All IPL teams agreed to shun Pak players
Indranil Basu, TNN, 21 January 2010, 12:04am IST

NEW DELHI: What was suspected after Tuesday’s auction of the Indian Premier League (IPL) is now confirmed - there was indeed a consensus among the team franchisees that none of them would bid for the Pakistani players. ( Watch Video )




Underlying this consensus were ambiguous signals from officialdom. Union sports minister MS Gill went on record on Wednesday insisting that neither his ministry nor the government had in any way nudged IPL teams to treat Pakistani players as untouchables. However, sources in the Indian cricket board (BCCI) gave TOI details of what transpired in the run-up to the auction, which suggest a more nuanced reality.


According to the sources, the BCCI initially told the franchisees that they could bid for Pakistani players and treat them just like cricketers from any other part of the world. Around the middle of December, the board also assured the teams that it would chip in with help for visas and other diplomatic clearances from the government.


However, when team owners asked the board "what guarantee will the franchisees have?", the board spoke to some government officials in the last week of December and reverted with the message that the government - understandably - couldn’t give "any guarantee". The prospects of possible terror attacks clearly contributed to this message.


Hence the IPL teams ignored the Pakistan players in auction as there was "no guarantee" from the government that these players would get visas and other clearances.


Also adding to the jitters of the IPL teams were apprehensions of possible disruption of IPL matches by parties like the Raj Thackeray-led Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and Shiv Sena in the event of Pakistani players participating. With Mumbai slated to host a major chunk of IPL matches in the forthcoming season - including seven home matches of the Mumbai Indians in the league and some knock-out matches - this became a major concern.


In fact, team managements said they were already getting calls from Australian players asking how seriously they should treat the threat by the Shiv Sena that it would not allow Australians to play in India in retaliation for the racist attacks on Indians Down Under.


"Security is a huge factor and it’s only the team owners who will have to take up the responsibility. BCCI is not responsible for internal security in the IPL. The board had asked the government if the Pakistanis would be safe in a place like Mumbai. The answer wasn’t too convincing with a senior state government functionary pointing out that barely a year had elapsed since the 26/11 terror attack in Mumbai," a BCCI insider told TOI on Wednesday.


"There was no direction from the board. The indication from the board was that the Pakistani players are shortlisted and you guys can bid for them. But they may not be welcomed in a place like Mumbai," a team official added. That, it appears, was enough to spook the franchisees into steering clear of Pakistani players.

The reputation of some of the Pakistani cricketers who had participated in the first season of the IPL in 2008 didn’t help either. The Delhi Daredevils were put off by Mohd Asif’s antics, while Shahid Afridi did not have a great relationship with Deccan Chargers.

The sources also said the ‘boycott’ of Pakistani players was likely to continue for similar reasons till such time as India and Pakistan resume bilateral cricketing ties. In other words, despite the homilies often trotted out about separating sports and politics, this is one case where politics will remain a determining factor.

___________________


Minus Pakistan

The Indian Express Tags : ie, editorial Posted: Thursday , Jan 21, 2010 at 0328 hrs


Figure this out. Eleven Pakistani men, most of them members of the squad that won the 2009 Twenty20 world championship, were among the cricketers up for auction. Eight franchisees of the Indian Premier League were looking to add punch to their teams in season three, exuding the enticing mix of glamour, guile and strategising that’s made the auction the IPL’s most self-celebratory event. It is a moment when the older ethos of cricket, based on the domestic and international calendars, is contrasted with the go-getting flamboyance of the IPL franchisees, all too often a moment when the future reveals itself. On Tuesday, when a bunch of cricketers including the 11 Pakistanis went under the hammer, that possible future revealed itself to be heartless. On that day not one of the 11 Pakistanis, each of whom was up for auction because each had been considered by at least one franchisee in the preparatory stage, received a single bid.

It is not immediately clear whether the team owners had been explicitly told not to grab the Pakistanis, among them Shahid Afridi (a game-changer on his day, which still comes by often enough) and Sohail Tanvir (the best bowler of IPL-I). Maybe the franchisees have a point when they say they were driven by considerations of player availability. After all, between them the Indian government and the IPL — led by its imperious commissioner, Lalit Modi — organised enough of an obstacle race last month to put doubts in the team owners’ minds. Then, crude ultimatums were issued to some of the Pakistanis by Modi on the pretext that they had not completed their paperwork and obtained visas. Maybe all that the team strategists were doing was pick up the signals emanating from the government and the IPL. After all, the Pakistan government too had been reluctant to allow their cricketers to participate in IPL-II, post-26/11.


However, none of that rationalisation lets anyone off the hook, not the governments, not the IPL, not the franchisees. Each in its own way has damaged the special place cricket has held during even the worst phases in India-Pakistan ties. Many times cricket between India and Pakistan has been suspended, but never has one country insulted the other’s cricketers. And whenever cricketers have been asked to prop up normalisation efforts, they have gamely obliged. Even if it be that no one explicitly set off Tuesday’s outrage, the result has damaged the game. Again it has been shown that cricket, with all the qualities and messages that attach to it, is not safe with the IPL.

_________________________


IPL should not have created false hopes

Ramiz Raja Tags : Ramiz Raja, IPL auction Posted: Thursday , Jan 21, 2010 at 0151 hrs


The Indian Premier League auction’s hammer has come down hard on Pakistan cricket. Like a jilted lover, the cricket fan here is heart-broken, confused and angry. The question he asks is how could the Twenty20 world champions not have a buyer? The IPL has a huge presence here in Pakistan. The country’s only sports channel beams the games live and has successfully replicated the magic of the event that enraptures audiences in India.

Today, however, the mood has changed. The cable operator association has vowed to block the event. The other great Indian import, Hindi cinema, has also come under pressure. The Sports Ministry and Parliament have got the knives out, terming this selection as a snub, and as a great Indian conspiracy to insult the nation and belittle the status of its cricketers. The players seem to be on the same page as the politicians and the media. This is not cricket, they say. All hell has broken loose.

_________________________



Press Trust Of India

Karachi, January 21, 2010

First Published: 10:28 IST(21/1/2010)

Last Updated: 12:14 IST(21/1/2010)

Former Pakistan captain Zaheer Abbas has suggested that the national hockey team should be withdrawn from the World Cup in India to protest the "humiliating" treatment meted out to the country's cricketers at the Indian Premier League auction.

Abbas said he would talk to sports minister Ejaz Jakhrani on the matter. The World Cup is due to held from last week of February in Delhi with Pakistan facing India in their opening match of a tournament they have not won since 1994.

"We need to make some sort of strong statement conveying our feelings over the way the IPL organisers and franchises deliberately insulted our cricketers at the auction," Abbas said.

Not a single Pakistani cricketer found a buyer at the glitzy auction held in Mumbai on Tuesday.

The former Test batsman said Pakistan must be clear about its sports policy with India and act accordingly.

"We must be clear about how we should have sporting relations with India because for the last one year they have been doing everything possible to hurt our image and isolate us internationally," he said.

Jakhrani was also in a belligerent mood while talking to the media after the national assembly and said Pakistan would be reviewing its sporting ties with India.

Jakhrani said the Pakistan Cricket Board should have taken into consideration everything before pressing the government to give clearance for Pakistani players to take part in the IPL.

"The PCB should have been more careful and analytical. And I will bring up this issue with the chief patron of the board," he said.

Dasti, the Chairman of the National Assembly standing committee on sports blamed the PCB leadership for the humiliation the players had to face at the IPL auction.

"This is not the first time the board and Chairman, Ejaz Butt have failed miserably to handle things properly and read the situation correctly," he said.

"That is why the NA standing committee has urged the chief patron to immediately change the Chairman of the board and make other changes in the cricket set-up," he said.

Dasti said it was the PCB's job to give proper advice to players on whether to make themselves available for the IPL or not.

"The PCB should have first got some assurance from the IPL chairman, Lalit Modi before allowing our players to send their clearance to the Indians," Dasti added

_________________________





Mumbai , January 20, 2010

First Published: 00:10 IST(20/1/2010)
Last Updated: 15:25 IST(20/1/2010)


India have fetched record prices, but there were no takers for the current world Twenty20 champions Pakistan.

That’s the message the third auction of the Indian Premier League sent out on Tuesday, when none of the 11 Pakistanis up for sale received any bids.

No, not even Shahid Afridi, the player of the tournament in the 2007 World Twenty20 and the man of match in both the semifinal and final of last summer’s T20 carnival.

No one would admit there was any directive of any sort to avoid bidding for Pakistani players. All Rajasthan Royals’ co-owner Shilpa Shetty would say was the franchises “were not convinced about their (the Pakistanis’) availability and that’s why did not want to take a risk.”

But privately, bidders admitted it was more than just visa hassles. “There was nothing official told but it was basically a pure business decision,” a franchise official told HT. “The IPL is a commercial proposition, owned by businessmen and no one wanted to risk upsetting the government.”

And Pakistan reacted angrily. PTI quoted Afridi as saying from Brisbane the way he saw it, “IPL and India have made fun of us and our country. We are the Twenty20 World Champions and the attitude of the franchisees was disappointing. I feel bad for the Indian people…”

All-rounder Abdul Razzaq indicated he saw the snub as a joint strategy between the IPL and the government to insult Pakistani players, while Pakistan Cricket Board chief Ijaz Butt told HT he was “shocked”.

“It’s not only shocking, but very disappointing as well. We were hoping that things would be all right and they had also confirmed that most of our players would be considered.”

He also said there were no visa issues with any of the 11 players. “We were given permission to travel to India from our foreign office and the ministry. All 11 Pakistani players in the IPL auction list had their papers ready and the sports minister in India was very kind to expedite things to ensure they were not troubled. I really don't know what went wrong, but it hurts.”

Meanwhile, the other issue that had a couple of top Indian players unhappy was how much players like Keiron Pollard and Shane Bond went for.

“It is quite possible that both Pollard and Bond went for almost as much, if not more, than some of the icon players,” said a player from Bangladesh. “And Roach, a complete unknown (he went for $720,000/Rs. 3.3 crore), must be laughing all the way to the bank.”

While Pollard and Bond both received the maximum open bid possible, of $750,000 (Rs. 3.43 cr), they were both ‘sold’ through tie-breaks, in which the bidding franchise wrote down a closed bid over and above the $750,000 and handed that over to IPL commissioner Lalit Modi.

_________________________


Ignoring Pakistani players very shocking: former Foreign Secretaries Sandeep Dikshit


Government says visas were issued to all Pakistani players for the auction

NEW DELHI: While the government distanced itself from the ignoring of Pakistani players in the Indian Premier League (IPL) auction, former Foreign Secretaries criticised the incident as “very shocking” and “unnecessary.”

The government washed its hands off the fiasco saying it had issued visas to all Pakistani players who wanted to be present for the auction and was prepared to issue the necessary entry documents had they been selected. In fact, sources pointed out that there was no red tape in issuing the visas, which were given in three batches in Pakistan, New Zealand and Australia.

One highly placed source felt that commercial and security considerations might have played a role in the franchisees deciding to treat Pakistani players as untouchables.

“Some people want to give the impression that the government was behind this. I have been told that franchisees became cautious after the experience of Australians leaving mid-way in the previous IPL due to international commitments. This time, had the Pakistanis been selected, they would have missed some of the matches. There could also have been some security considerations,” the source said.

The former Foreign Secretary, Muchkund Dubey, however, called the sidelining of the 11 players “totally irrational,” considering Pakistan was the World T20 champion. He said this could not have been done without a nudge or hint from some wing of the government.

“Pakistan is the world champion and plays brilliant cricket. It would be very difficult for team managements not to vie for some of them. It is really shameful if the Board of Control for Cricket in India [BCCI] was behind this. This is against the ethics of sports, against the ethics of managing such things. This is very shocking and short-sighted. Just because our relations are not normal and there is some tension in our ties, this does not mean we should touch such depths,” Mr. Dubey said.

‘Solid team’

Kanwal Sibal, another former Foreign Secretary, felt that if the incident was related to politics, then it was “unnecessary” because Pakistan was a “very solid” cricketing nation.

“They have excellent cricket players and the selection should have been purely in the realm of sports. The current problem at the political level should not have been a determining factor. This is more so when contacts at the people-to-people level are increasing and Pakistani delegations are meeting their Indian counterparts to improve their relations,” Mr. Sibal said.

He added that if the franchisees decided on their own not to bid for any Pakistani player, they were taking an “exaggerated view” of the degree of public resistance to Pakistani participation in the IPL.

The former External Affairs Minister, K. Natwar Singh, said the option to bid or not to bid was entirely up to the franchisees. “The government has no control. If no one bids for them what can you do? If people are investing so much money they cannot be forced to select a player from this or that nation,” he said.

Creating unnecessary hype!

The Big Picture
After the three Tests come the five ODIs and a Twenty20 to complete Pakistan's tour. While the opening segment of the trip ended in a 3-0 victory for Australia, the limited-overs arrangements will be much more competitive.
Despite the result, Pakistan's squad became more united as the tour went on and they have received some key reinforcements, with Younis Khan and Shahid Afridi added to the unit. The tourists have also troubled Australia in their most recent engagements and their fast-bowling unit, which includes Mohammad Aamer, will worry the hosts at times. Australia won a tight series in the UAE 3-2 last year and the teams also ran into each other at the Champions Trophy, when Australia sneaked home by two wickets.
This series will be an important gauge of the popularity of the 50-over game. Twenty20 crowds have been huge for the domestic Big Bash and five-match head-to-head series against Pakistan and West Indies will test Australia's love affair with the format that began here in the 1970s.
I suppose this is an old tactic of winning the war before the war actually started. Creating that sorta pressure on the opposition team that they eventually end-up getting pressurized and later under-performance result.

I don't know why our media instead of being a copy cat, try to be realistic and do the job like the media of those country's doing for theirs, instead we're here enflaming the views and reviews and other useless things. We need to get matured as other countries have been.

Similar sorta hype was created at the start of the Melbourne and Sydney test, and because of that I suppose the team got under-pressured, which is their weakness, we should not blame others for it as other are for exploiting your weak-points. On the other hand we've a habit of exposing ourselves unnecessarily, whether it refers to our weak-points, strong-points, injury etc. everywhere we get exploited because of our own weakness of exposing unnecessarily.

The way Aussie media exploiting this weakness of Pakistani cricket team and media management, I don't think the end result of the ODI SERIES won't be different than that of the recently concluded TEST SERIES.

Peace!

An Insult, with love from India - thanks to some of our own heads

Yesterday, Tuesday 19th of January 2010, was a cashing day for all Pakistani news TV channels, as it was the breaking news all around the circuit that none of the Pakistani players, who and their head i.e. Mr. Ejaz Butt (the Butt head ofcourse) who worked so hard to get part into the third leg of the T20 tournament namely IPL, the IPL franchises drew water on their hopes by not selecting either of the top notch T20 players of the Pakistani T20 side.

It was almost predicted by some of the Cricket Analysts that it seems difficult that Pakistani T20 team players might induct into the IPL3 but thanks to our Cricket Board's chairman, Mr. Butt, we were trying to make hole in the building's beam pillar with the help of a hammer and screw =P, end result- nada.

Why can't we think of the consequences when we apply international assignments? Like for the last international tour in Pakistan, i.e. Sri Lanka's test tour of Pakistan, security didn't seemed to be fool proof either, even in the Karachi test, where Younus Khan scored 300 runs, during that memorable test match, I didn't see that much tight security as much as I expected as I used to go through Hassan Square to the Jail Road via University Rd. their wasn't that much strict security, keeping in mind, ICC had clearly mentioned that this tour is a testing one as in failing, the governing organization might not be able to convince the foreign teams to visit the entangled in war country and to play here, even knowing that, we didn't do our homework, we even went down, to as low as Sri Lanka's management, keeping in mind, managerial wise in South Asia, India is on top, after that Bangladesh than Sri Lanka and than thanks to 3rd March fiasco, Pakistan lie on the fourth and the last position, else during 1999 - 2003 it was rated between 2nd and 3rd in the same rating.

Whatever did happen yesterday, it was a direct slap on the face of Pakistan Cricket Board, a.k.a. PCB and indirect on Pakistani Cricket and on Pakistan itself. Keeping in mind, our team is the only team in T20 cricket till now, which didn't loose a single T20 match since winning the T20 world cup in England last year, still these players weren't bid for this years IPL, how shame!

And more shameful on the Cricket Board of Pakistan, that they aren't shameful on what they did! Loose management, lost contacts from neighboring Cricket Boards, not airing of Pakistani U19 world cup matches on the TV - complaining that time doesn't match, even we don't have that much warmly greeted relations with the South East Asian Cricket Boards like India and Sri Lanka are having.

We want some live wires in the management, unlike those rotten wires which are being re-used again while stripping into the new. God knows after such things people might take their child away from cricket, the last of the sport which is played with so much zeal all over Pakistan.

Some analysts say, Pakistan ka Khuda hi Hafiz hai (God is the only savior for Pakistan), we should also say that Pakistani Cricket ka bhi Khuda hi Hafiz hai (God is also the savior for Pakistan Cricket)

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Pakistan lost the 3mobile series 3-0 against the Aussies

As Brydon Coverdale on Cricinfo stated:
Australia wrapped up their 12th consecutive Test victory over Pakistan on the final afternoon in Hobart, where Khurram Manzoor's fighting half-century was not enough to salvage a draw for the visitors. Nathan Hauritz added to his growing reputation as Test bowler by picking up the key wicket of Manzoor and finished with three, while Peter Siddle also grabbed a trio of victims.
Despite showers being forecast, the only sprinkling of rain came during the lunch break and it wasn't enough to delay Australia's charge to a series clean-sweep and a fifth Test win of the summer. Australia have now equalled the record for the most consecutive Test wins by any country over any other nation, matching the 12-game streak currently held by Sri Lanka over Bangladesh.
The only slight concerns for Australia came during a 66-run seventh-wicket stand between Manzoor and Mohammad Aamer. Manzoor, who came in for this Test at No. 3, enhanced his chances of keeping his place in the side with a patient 77 from 239 deliveries that gave Pakistan, for the morning at least, a tiny sniff of saving the game.
What can I more say about this dismal performance, no doubt Australia outplayed them but they had their chances, which they didn't took, else situation would be different. The whole tour they looked shaky and under-prepared, thank goodness, our bowling played its part for face saving, plus they way our skipper held the post match presentation it was rubbish.
All the way from the start of the series to the end, it was under-prepared Pakistani team, instead of working on the weaknesses which were exposed in New Zealand, we were busy handling the media and busy in submitting comments in the media.
Here I totally disagree with MoYo (Mohammad Yousuf) that T20 cricket is demolishing the Pakistani cricket. If that's the case than why he's fulfilling friendships in the team, like we say in Urdu; ڈھونڈ نے سے خدا بھی مل جاتا ہے means if we work hard than we can find the God within, but here the selectors, team management and current team-mates can't find the test batsman like Asim Kamal. There should be players separate for Test and ODI (and add T20) modules of the game, a typical test player might induct into a ODI playing side but a typical ODI player can't induct directly into the test arena which like its name, is testing.
Plus where were our Mr. Skipper when he joined ICL T20 tournament "just to show" the selectors that he's capable of playing T20 cricket, claimed by the person whose running between the wickets is objectional and is not reliable candidate which is the main critaria for T20 cricket. Plus being a weak skipper on the whole, as instead of taking the things on himself he's blaming the others for the responsiblities, a more responsible comment was given by Salman Butt himself after he was asked off the anguish comment of MoYo.
Plus it seems that the team management had given all the rights of thinking to MoYo who showed us how good he thinks and manages. Instead of giving chances to worthy candidates, they're giving chances to friends only company!
Just imagine during the Pak NZ series in NZ, how much MoYo emphasized on recalling of Misbah, if he had done the same for Younus, there won't have to be a problem, which shows how much he was willing in both the cases.
This clearly shows how much they're playing for the country. The country comes second and friendships first. I know its a harsh comment but thats what I feel, he's just in a ego of showing that he's a strong captain "who every time takes a U-Turn" like the one we have to take at Civic center side while coming from the New Town Society.
Bowling was the only positive which wasn't exploited as much like out batting and fielding by the Aussies. Giving confidence is a good thing but when the person isn't performing well so its better to give chance to the deserving ones.
Even their interviews in the TV shows depicts they want to show their importance rather than concentrating on their game, frankly speaking 3 years ago untill MoYo joined the ICL, I respected that person alot but now since he has been concentrating other things than cricket has ruined his own image and because of that image of Pakistan is also degrading, he doesn't know how to talk in these sorta situations when we lost the match and how to thank the host country's hospitality because in a foreign country, these players are the ambassadors of Pakistan, how well they have been, we all know...
Peace!

Unnecessary religious influence in the Pakistani cricket team

Actually the reason I am blogging today is rather religious compared to sporty one. Its about the religious influence on our cricketers more than it required.

From my cricketing knowledge, it all started during the span after 1999, when there were some changes occurred in cricket structure in Pakistan, i.e. application of ad-hoc and etc, similarly during those times, the seed of religious norms were also ploughed during this time period. I am not saying that they shouldn't be religious but there's a thin line between them, we should try our hundred percent and then left the rest to Allah, but here we're entering the ground, like we say in Urdu, اللہ توکل means having blind faith in Allah without doing nothing, i.e. Allah will do it for sure, this thing we usually call in اللہ توکل manner, and because of this thinking in our players from that time, we've been downgraded just because we're اللہ توکل all the time, that Allah is our side and he'll help us without moving a feet.

Even Allah has not told us Muslims to be so lazy like they're showing, being religious isn't that bad, but showing such lazy attitude in the field is. Everyone in the world have faith on their Gods, but first they work hard and after that they left the rest on their belief. But here from the ball one we're showing and conveying such messages to our counterparts that we're just on the belief of the one whose watching us, even after the post-match presentation, our skippers usually blame their lucks that luck wasn't their side, and that, that one player wasn't available that's why we faultered, I just wanna say good things to those, that we should take lessons from the Aussies whom 2nd grade team beat us in our home-series in the UAE, just because they had belief on their God and on their own selves, but here we only have belief in Allah and claim that Allah will make them play the shots.

Now something about تبلیغ means preaching, our players have given primary importance to preaching and than to cricket. Whenever possible they try to preach and like we say in Urdu دکان چمکانا means whenever they get chance, they start to preach without knowing that the person in front of them wants to change his/her religion or not, emotional brats. The common and recent examples were, Bob Woolmer and recently during the Pakistan New Zealand test series in New Zealand, MoYo (Mohammad Yousuf formerly Yousuf Youhana) tried the same, i.e. Preaching with Danial Vettori but it went vein, such things should be stopped as its hurting and have hurt alot of Pakistani cricket image and whenever possible the neighboring country's powerful media exploits it easily.

First we should clear own collars than try doing these things and leave these things to those who're capable of doing these sorta things!

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Kamran dropped from final eleven!

Kamran dropped from final eleven

HOBART: Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has announced the final eleven for Hobart test series against Australia, Geo News reported Wednesday.

Pakistan has dropped wicket-keeper and vice captain Kamran Akmal and made three other changes ahead of the third Test against Australia in Hobart.

Akmal has been replaced by rookie keeper Safraz Ahmed after a bizarre standoff between the vice captain and selectors, with Akmal repeatedly insisting his place in the team was safe.

The gloveman - who dropped four catches as Australia pulled off a miraculous victory at the SCG last week - was forced to 'drop himself' as he is part of Paksitan's four-man selection panel.

Pakistan manager Adbul Raquib said the panel unanimously decided to play Safraz ahead of Akmal.

In other changes, Shoaib Malik and Khurran Manzoor have come in for struggling batsmen Faisal Iqbal and Misbah-ul-Haq, while teenage paceman Mohammad Aamer returns in place of Mohammad Sami.

Meanwhile Australia has recalled opening batsman Simon Katich, who will replace Phillip Hughes at the top of the order.

Pakistan: Mohammad Yousuf (captain), Imran Farhat, Salman Butt, Khurram Manzoor, Umar Akmal, Shoaib Malik, Sarfraz Ahmed, Mohammad Aamer, Umar Gul, Mohammed Asif, Danish Kaneria, Faisal Iqbal (12th man).


Others may call me cynical that I always used to criticize and not anything constructive, so this wont be new, but just see for yourself, a day before the shameful defeat against the Aussies (no doubt we should congratulate the Aussies for keeping their cools) even the Indian Media was saying that Team Pakistan is about to make a history, defeating a test match against Australia in Australia after 15 years, last time they won a test match against the Aussies were in 1995 in the captaincy of Wasim Akram, but just because of dismal performance of Kamran Akmal, even Aamir Sohail openly said in a TV program post match result, that Aussies have not won against us but we gifted the match served in a tray to them, others also claimed that they've not won but we've lost...

I am not taking side of Moin Khan or Rashid Latif, but it has been time since they've retired long time back, still they look more fitter and athletic than Kamran Akmal, like Rashid Latif mentioned in a press conference after Kamran Akmal practiced in his academy that the one drawback of his is that he's over-weight and just because of that he can't make swift movements like Brad Haddin made to take the catch of Salman Butt in the final innings of Sydney test.

So why he was so persistent and no other substitute keeper was along him in order to have competition like we used to see between Rashid Latif and Moin Khan? Even in teams like Sri Lanka, where at times they used to have Romesh Kaluwitherana (sorry if I spelled wrong) and Kumar Sangakkara, and now Kumar Sangakkara and Prassanna Jaywardene into competition, its good that we persist with a unchanged line-up altogether but this sorta competition is required, which was not seen after 2004 when Moin and Rashid were all out from the cricketting scene.

Its my personal opinion that there would be some positive competition like students in their student lives have it with other student, in this way you can avail positive results, again I'll "criticize" the weak management of the Pakistan Cricket Team which fell into players' power because of which many deserving candidates (don't want to name them for some reasons) weren't able to get chance in the team although their performance was much better than that of the currently playing players, most importantly, Misbah-ul-Haq, whose own batting form is questionable who after T20 world cup in 2007 (3 years ago) wasn't able to produce that kinda form but still he was recalled for the home-series against the Kiwis in New Zealand, when he was playing a private league in Bangladesh voiding the currently played domestic circuit matches of the most prestigious domestic tournament of the country, i.e. The Quaid-e-Azam Trophy, so what would be the emotional level of those deserving players who played so well, even in the 2006 U19 world cup held in Sri Lanka, we saw how Pakistani U19 pace-battery took on the opposition and let us won the U19 world cup for the second time after a low scoring encounter which everyone expected would be one sided encounter and the boys in blue will bulldoze the boys in parrot green. Why so aren't we using that talent?

If its for the friendship going on, friendship would be more suitable if the "friend" is also deserving for such favour, that kinda friendship is acceptable, but such friendship which shows that they're more playing for cementing their places instead for the pride of the country and nation, what should we be dong to them, than!

Monday, January 04, 2010

Pakistan's bowling in the New Years test match

Alex Brown at SCG rightly stated
Mohammad Asif completed a career-best six-wicket haul as part of Pakistan's broader demolition of Australia that called into question Ricky Ponting's decision to bat first on a Sydney green-top. In union with Mohammad Sami, who dismissed Australia's top three batsmen before the first drinks break, Asif exploited the heavy pitch and atmospheric conditions to full effect to rout Australia for 127 - their second-lowest total batting first at the SCG and worst at home since 1996.
It was because of the disciplined bowling of not only Mohammad Asif and other bowlers but on the whole it was a team's effort, and they showed team work, and they looked with a plan, not like randomly playing with no plan at MCG, where they had a humiliating defeat. Australian media too, created such hype and undue pressure which was shown on Pakistani players on the Boxing Day test match, regarding the visitor's bowling attack, and thus they had won the fight much earlier than the original end of the test match.

But this time, they had miss-cued, and under-estimated the Pakistani bowling attack. Thats why in over-confidence Ricky Ponting after winning the toss on a green-top and over-cast conditions, invited Pakistan to bowl first, in return Pakistan took the advantage and took 10 wickets of Australia first time in an inning for the first time in the series.

But here I am disagreeing with some of the comments of Australian greats that in these conditions even a mid-yorker bowling attack would have succeeded, overshadowing the exampled show of the Pakistani seem bowling, they are usually famous for doing such things, and that's why they most of the time get the unexpected what they had planned, so literally I don't have that much of regret because they can't help it showing their reaction.

On the whole Pakistan this time is playing more sensible than MCG, just keeping the fingers crossed, test match still open and lets pray for the positive result from this test match as we all know winning this test match is important for both teams to improve their rankings, in Pakistan's case it will be slight and only increase or decrease in some points and nothing on the Raking in any case but in Australia's case it will be more as it will either degrade them to 4th spot or will help them retain 3rd position.

Cheers

Search This Blog

Flag Counter at Cricsphere

Free counters!

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Featured Post

ICC Champions Trophy 2025 - The resolution of the India-Pakistan Champions Trophy standoff a win? Not even close!

The cricketing world is abuzz with controversy as India refuses to travel to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025, while Pakistan rec...