Innocent unless proven guilty or guilty unless proven innocent???

Cameras showed Shoaib Akhtar trying to play with the seam of the white cricket ball

As if Englishmen are angels!!!!

Do you call this a fair tactics? They called Shoaib Akhtar cheating in the game with respect to ball tampering, and showed the file footages of it. Although whatever Shoaib did wasn't to be praised of, but why can't the English media try to point out such things with their own players? Cheating if we go into the past was started from them, and even people who safeguard such people belonged from there... 

Who can forget Mr. Lever's Vaseline incident, or a Kiwi bowler's confession of ball tampering against Pakistan in a match played at Faisalabad, apart from confession he supported his claim by saying the he did it because Pakistanis also do the same!!! How pathetic... Ok lets ignore this one too... What about Tim Bresnan's latest thing (image), ball tempering and that too from the very first ball!!!
Plus they humiliated Muhammad Aamer as a cheat although in their own terms one can't be guilty unless proven guilty, and unless they're PROVEN guilty, they're assumed to be innocent, so why insulting the young Muhammad Aamer as cheat, by not shaking hands with him during a post match presentation, and when they were not proven guilty, why they were suspended. Although in my opinion the lagness is more of PCB as before ICC, PCB could have had punished the players on their behalf so that ICC couldn't punish them on the same offence, like once an English Manager jumped off his dressing room to punish a English player on a offence so that ICC couldn't punish them, so this shows that PCB was late to react, and now they've to tackle with the ICC punishment, but punishing before being proven guilty is not a good tactic.

I've been hearing some comments from former players and current British Sky commentators that atleast Aamer should be spared on the behalf of his underage advantage, what I am asking is why he be spared when he's not proven guilty??? When the British can hire back Mazhar Majeed, the person who played with the name of Pakistani players and was found counting money and betting for proving that he has several Pakistani players under his belt, such a corrupt person is rehired in a football club, claiming he's innocent unless and until proven guilty. With all due respect, Mushtaq Ahmed former Pakistani leg spinner, also had cases on him regarding match fixing, still he has been hired as the national bowling coach for England, when such latest examples show leniency, claiming not guilty unless they're proven, so why playing the double standard for English and Non English? They call themselves the people who'd die for justice, is this the way justice is done? On behalf of some tabloid's allegations, Pakistani players are insulted and humiliated, and even higher officials of ECB prohibited shaking hands with them, and on the other hand, the person who ruined the green shirters good name, is again rehired claiming he's innocent unless proven guilt. Isn't it a shame for a proud nation?